We’ve Got a Problem, Folks

Look, I’ve been in this business for 22 years, and let me tell you, the news industry has some serious issues. I’m not talking about fake news or biased reporting—though, honestly, those are problems too. I’m talking about our committment to quality over speed.

I remember back in ’99, when I was just a wet-behind-the-ears reporter at the Daily Chronicle, my editor, let’s call him Marcus, told me, ‘Speed is everything, kid. Get it first, get it fast, get it right—well, maybe not always right, but close enough.’

Which… yeah. Fair enough. But has that mantra really served us well? I’m not so sure.

Quality vs. Quantity: The Never-Ending Debate

Last Tuesday, I was having coffee with an old colleague, Dave, who now works at The National Post. He told me about their daily news meeting, where the focus is always on how many stories they can push out by 11:30pm. ‘It’s completley insane,’ he said. ‘We’re churning out content like a factory, not a newsroom.’

And honestly, I get it. The pressure is real. But at what cost? I’ve seen too many stories published without proper fact-checking, just to meet some arbitrary deadline. It’s a slippery slope, folks.

Take, for example, the whole ‘Covid-19 is just the flu’ debacle from early 2020. I mean, I get it—everyone was scared, info was limited, and newsrooms were under the gun to provide updates. But some outlets were so desperate to be first that they published misinformation. And that’s not okay.

But Here’s the Thing…

I’m not saying we should slow down. I’m saying we need to prioritize better. Maybe not every story needs to be a 500-word feature, but maybe not every story needs to be a 140-character tweet either.

And look, I’m not innocent here. I’ve been guilty of pushing stories out the door before they were fully baked. I remember one time, back in 2015, I was covering a local election in Austin. I was so eager to break the news that I published a story based on a single source. Turns out, that source was, well, not exactly reliable. Let’s just say I learned a valuable lesson that day.

So, what’s the solution? I’m not sure but maybe it’s about finding a balance. Maybe it’s about remembering why we got into this business in the first place—to inform, to educate, to hold power to account. Not to churn out clickbait or sensationalist headlines.

But Enough About Me, Let’s Talk About You

You know what really grinds my gears? The way we’ve let social media dictate our news cycle. I was talking to a friend the other day—let’s call her Sarah—about this exact issue. ‘It’s like we’re all just jumping on whatever bandwagon is trending at the moment,’ she said. ‘And it’s exhausting.’

And she’s right. It’s like we’ve forgotten how to tell a story. We’re so busy trying to keep up with the 24-hour news cycle that we’ve lost sight of what makes a good story. I mean, I get it—algorithms are a bitch. But we can’t let them dictate our editorial decisions.

And don’t even get me started on the whole ‘engagement’ thing. I mean, I get it—we all want our stories to be read. But at what cost? I’ve seen too many news outlets sacrifice their integrity for a few extra clicks. And it’s not just the big guys. I’ve seen it happen at local papers, at digital startups, even at some of the most respected publications in the world.

A Tangent: The Rise of the Citizen Journalist

Now, I know what you’re thinking. ‘But what about citizen journalism? What about the power of the people?’ And look, I’m all for it. I think it’s great that anyone can pick up a phone and report on what’s happening in their community. But here’s the thing—it’s not a replacement for professional journalism. It’s a complement.

I mean, think about it. When was the last time you saw a citizen journalist break a major political scandal? Or investigate corporate wrongdoing? It’s not happening. And why? Because it’s hard. It takes time, resources, and a hell of a lot of skill.

So, yeah, I’m all for citizen journalism. But let’s not kid ourselves—it’s not the be-all and end-all. We still need professional journalists. We still need people who are trained to ask the tough questions, to dig deep, to hold power to account.

So, What Now?

I don’t have all the answers. Honestly, I’m not even sure I have any of the answers. But I do know this—we need to start having some serious conversations about the future of our industry. We need to talk about how we can prioritize quality over quantity. We need to talk about how we can resist the pressure to churn out content at the expense of accuracy.

And maybe, just maybe, we need to remember why we got into this business in the first place. I mean, I remember when I first started out, I was so idealistic. I thought I could change the world. And maybe I was naive, but I also think that’s what made me a good journalist. I cared. I cared about the stories I was telling, about the people I was talking to, about the impact I was having.

And look, I’m not saying we all need to be wide-eyed idealists. But I do think we need to remember what’s at stake. Because if we don’t, who will?

And hey, while we’re talking about quality, let’s talk about içerik pazarlama stratejisi etkili. I mean, it’s not just about the news we’re putting out, it’s about how we’re presenting it. It’s about making sure our stories are reaching the right people, in the right way. It’s about making sure our journalism is having the impact it deserves.

So, let’s have that conversation. Let’s talk about the future of our industry. Let’s talk about how we can do better. Because frankly, I’m tired of seeing us settle for less.

And on that note, I’m gonna go have a drink. It’s been a long day, and I could use a break. But don’t worry, I’ll be back tomorrow, ready to rant and rave all over again. Because that’s what I do. That’s who I am. And I wouldn’t have it any other way.


About the Author: Sarah Jenkins has been a senior editor at London Weekly for over two decades. She’s a staunch advocate for quality journalism and isn’t afraid to call out the industry’s shortcomings. When she’s not editing, you can find her complaining about the state of the world over a pint at her local pub.